Fifth Circuit· 7/25/2019
Benjamin v. United States (In Re Benjamin)
Citations
- 932 F.3d 293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing its holding conflicts with the “majority of our sister circuits”
- recognizing its holding conflicts with the “majority of our sister circuits”
- using the statutory text to determine whether Congress intended a substantive change during a recodification
- “[W]e interpret the third sentence [of § 405(h)] to mean what it says. And it says nothing about § 1334. The district court erred by concluding that the third sentence barred the bankruptcy court’s § 1334 jurisdiction.”
- discussing United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clement, Graves, Oldham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Benjamin v. United States (In Re Benjamin)
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.