Steven Hotze v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretary H

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that allegations more detailed than the Professors’ did not plausibly allege emotional harm
• \[T]he complaint at no point clearly alleges that the health-insurance policy that Braidwood already provides to Dr. Hotze fails to satisfy the mandates.\
• “[I]f the plaintiff does not carry his burden “clearly to allege facts demonstrating that he is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute, then dismissal for lack of standing is appropriate.”
• Section 4980H exaction is a tax

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).