Skip to main content

Belton v. State

Citations

  • 512 S.E.2d 614
  • 270 Ga. 671
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 755
  • 1999 Ga. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that what the evidence would have shown was not relevant to the question of whether defense counsel performed deficiently in not pursuing the evidence
  • finding that what the evidence would have shown was not relevant to the question of whether defense counsel performed deficiently in not pursuing the evidence
  • explaining that “the comparison of shoe prints to the external physical characteristics of particular shoes is not a matter of scientific principle or technique” to which Harper does not apply
  • expert’s testimony regarding shoe print identification was based on observation, skill, and experience, not scientific principles, and was thus not subject to Harper
  • expert’s testimony regarding shoe print identification was based on observation, skill, and experience, not scientific principles, and was thus not subject to Harper
  • trial court did not err in admitting witness as expert in shoe impressions without conducting the proper analysis because expert testimony was not required on the subject

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.