Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 519 P.2d 804
  • 1974 Alas. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a security officer employed by a state-owned airport was a state agent subject to constitutional search and seizure limitations because his regular duties included law enforcement functions and criminal investigation
  • holding that a security officer employed by a state-owned airport was a state agent subject to constitutional search and seizure limitations because his regular duties included law enforcement functions and criminal investigation
  • noting that the State must demonstrate knowing possession}. . AS 11.71.140(b)(1)(N). . Hoekzema v. State, 193 P.3d 765, 767 (Alaska App.2008) (citing Eide v. State, 168 P.3d 499, 500-01 (Alaska App.2007)
  • noting that the State must demonstrate knowing possession
  • search by airport security guard must be supported by probable cause because of the guard’s law enforcement duties
  • officer with “training in drug and narcotics identification believed vegetable material to be marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Erwin, Boochever, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.