Skip to main content

Rice v. Huff

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 774
  • 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1158
  • 2000 WL 1026353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
  • applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
  • “The statute of limitations applicable to adverse possession claims does not apply to public lands, and, therefore, title to public property cannot be claimed on the basis of adverse possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holliger, Lowenstein, Ulrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.