Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/25/2000
Rice v. Huff
Citations
- 22 S.W.3d 774
- 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1158
- 2000 WL 1026353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
- applying § 516.090 and holding that “the statute of limitations on an adverse possession claim of a dedicated street only begins to run once a city vacates or discontinues the street”
- “The statute of limitations applicable to adverse possession claims does not apply to public lands, and, therefore, title to public property cannot be claimed on the basis of adverse possession.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holliger, Lowenstein, Ulrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-01-17· cited 19×
- In Re Estate of HaydenMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-06-30· cited 9×
- Basye v. Fayette R-III School District Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-09-21· cited 8×
- Mudloff v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-05-29· cited 6×
- Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 6×
- Ben Brower Prop. Co. v. Evella, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-07-02· cited 5×
- Przybylski v. BarbosaMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-04-28· cited 3×
- Client Services, Inc. v. City of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-01-24· cited 3×
- Roy, Hirschbuhl, Barr v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-11-01
- THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY v. DOUGLAS L. COVERDELL, and CITY OF BRANSONMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05
- Kansas City Area Transportation Authority v. Gerard H. DonovanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-02-04
- Carolyn Casteel v. Charles LammersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2024-03-19
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-04-20· cited 2,373×
- Silcox v. SilcoxSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-12-21· cited 52×
- Flowers v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-10-13· cited 46×
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri· 1957-04-08· cited 39×
- Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-02-20· cited 37×
- State Ex Rel. Clay Equipment Corp. v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri· 1963-01-14· cited 34×
- Julian v. Mayor, Councilmen and CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri· 1965-06-14· cited 26×
- Bell v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-11-23· cited 25×
- Mahaffy v. City of Woodson TerraceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-11-18· cited 20×
- City of Salisbury v. NagelMissouri Court of Appeals· 1967-10-02· cited 19×
- Shoemaker v. HouchenMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-05-11· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Gove v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-07-14· cited 14×
- Reynolds v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-04-23· cited 12×
- Midwestern Realty Corp. v. City of GrandviewMissouri Court of Appeals· 1967-04-03· cited 12×
- Williams v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-04-06· cited 10×
- Layne v. City of WindsorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-06-09· cited 8×
- Wilson v. Wheeler Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-12-04· cited 7×
- Burks v. City of LickingMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-10-19· cited 7×
- State v. KlineMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-06-24· cited 6×
- Mitchell v. City of Everton ex rel. KnackstedtMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-08-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.