Bell, Boyd & Lloyd v. Jack W. Tapy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining entry of summary judgment based on inadequacy of non-movant’s factual statement, despite acknowledgement that affidavit underlying that statement would otherwise have been sufficient to establish dispute of material fact for purposes of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56
• sustaining entry of summary judgment based on inadequacy of nonmovant’s factual statement, where district court would not consider affidavit underlying that statement
• equivocal response to movant’s positive assertion made under oath was not adequate response under Local Rule 12
• statement included no references to supporting materials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).