Thomas FLAHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “bruised . . . ego” from reassignment that one finds “personally humiliating” is “insufficient”
• holding that a semantic change in title and a “bruised ego” were not a material adverse change where pay and benefits remained the same
• holding that a transfer causing plaintiff's title to be changed and resulting in the plaintiff having to report to a former subordinate may have bruised the plaintiff's ego, but did not constitute adverse employment action
• holding that reassignment is not an adverse employment action
• finding that plaintiff's \bruised ego\ resulting from lateral transfer was insufficient to establish adverse employment action
• explaining that facts are deemed admitted when a party fails to properly place them in dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).