District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/26/1990
Beckman v. Farmer
Citations
- 579 A.2d 618
- 1990 D.C. App. LEXIS 183
- 1990 WL 109606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Although the manner in which the parties themselves characterize the relationship is probative, the question ultimately is objective [intent].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Steadman, Farrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clay Properties, Inc. v. Washington Post Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-03-17· cited 49×
- Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-15· cited 49×
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-06-18· cited 46×
- Federal Marketing Co. v. Virginia Impression Products Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-05-15· cited 45×
- Stevens v. United General Title InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-06-20· cited 42×
- Williams Electronics Games, Inc. v. GarritySeventh Circuit· 2004-04-29· cited 32×
- Southex Exhibitions, Inc. v. Rhode Island Builders Ass'nFirst Circuit· 2002-02-08· cited 31×
- Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1990-12-11· cited 30×
- Kelly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 30×
- American Continental Insurance Co. v. PooyaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-05· cited 29×
- Garcia v. LlerenaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-27· cited 27×
- Young v. DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-09-22· cited 25×
- Michael Queen v. Ed SchultzD.C. Circuit· 2014-04-04· cited 25×
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Ashdale (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-12-04· cited 23×
- LaFond v. SweeneySupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-01-20· cited 22×
- Smith v. ReddMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-11· cited 21×
- Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union v. CuellarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-15· cited 19×
- Robinson v. NussbaumDistrict of Columbia· 1997-07-23· cited 18×
- Sullivan, Bodney & Hammond, PC v. BodneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-11-22· cited 17×
- Beegle v. Restaurant Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-06-27· cited 17×
Cites
114 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1983-01-17· cited 371×
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-07-31· cited 240×
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-20· cited 225×
- McKenna v. AustinD.C. Circuit· 1943-02-11· cited 149×
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 148×
- Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.First Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 125×
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-09-05· cited 118×
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-09-30· cited 104×
- Chapman v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Supreme Court· 1950-03-27· cited 81×
- Johnson v. WeinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-07-28· cited 74×
- J. Edward Day v. William H. AveryD.C. Circuit· 1977-04-25· cited 72×
- Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-02-11· cited 70×
- Bailey and Williams v. WestfallTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-02-27· cited 68×
- Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-10· cited 67×
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-06-11· cited 65×
- Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-05-22· cited 64×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.