Sullivan, Bodney & Hammond, PC v. Bodney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \ Jewel and Fox are persuasive authority and establish a trend by courts in dealing with the issue before us\
• holding in dissolution of law firm corporation, partners only entitled to receive payment from pending contingency fee cases according to their interest in the firm prior to dissolution
• holding contingency fee cases commenced prior to dissolution are assets of the firm
• “ ‘work in progress at the time of dissolution is an asset of the dissolved firm and the partners have an obligation to complete the work in progress,’ ” quoting Marr v. Langhoff, 322 Md. 657, 667-68, 589 A.2d 470, 476 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).