Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to further address issue that appellants “apparently abandoned” in reply brief and did not “attempt to resurrect” at oral argument
• proceeding likewise with contracts that were “integrated, unambiguous, [and] [spoke] for themselves”
• the meaning of ambiguous contract language is an issue for the finder of fact
• ‘Where a contract is unambiguous ... ‘summary judgment is appropriate ... since, absent such ambiguity, a written contract duly signed and executed speaks for itself and binds the parties without the necessity of extrinsic evidence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).