State v. Schaub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appeal allowed under Rule 36.10 where case involved an interpretation of the implied consent statute and a constitutional issue involving former jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-10-05· cited 29×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-07-03· cited 22×
• Beasley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1994-10-26· cited 7×
• Stephenson v. City of Fort Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-10-18· cited 5×
• Frana v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-01-08· cited 4×
• Huitt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-09-30· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-12-16· cited 15×
• Gober v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1987-09-16· cited 5×
• State v. Harvest
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1989-01-18· cited 5×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1892-02-13· cited 3×