Kyles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 26-504 impliedly repealed part of § 27-601 (4)
• holding that § 26-504 impliedly repealed part of § 27-601 (4)
• finding that “OCGA § 17-3-3 is intended to function solely as a savings provision”
• finding that “OCGA § 17-3-3 is intended to function solely as a savings provision”
• the six-month period referenced in OCGA § 17-3-3 operates as an extension, rather than a limit, on the otherwise applicable limitation period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).