Skip to main content
· 5/26/1981

Beard v. Akzona, Inc.

Citations

  • 517 F. Supp. 128
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that publicity element was not met when embarrassing facts about one employee were disclosed to five other employees in management
  • finding dismissal appropriate where \only a few ... employees heard the tape recorded message initially and were told not to repeat it\
  • recognizing public disclosure of private facts under the Restatement approach
  • information disclosed to only five employees of corporation insufficient to establish publicity
  • information disclosed to only five employees of corporation insufficient to establish publicity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.