E.D. Tennessee· 5/26/1981
Beard v. Akzona, Inc.
Citations
- 517 F. Supp. 128
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that publicity element was not met when embarrassing facts about one employee were disclosed to five other employees in management
- finding dismissal appropriate where \only a few ... employees heard the tape recorded message initially and were told not to repeat it\
- recognizing public disclosure of private facts under the Restatement approach
- information disclosed to only five employees of corporation insufficient to establish publicity
- information disclosed to only five employees of corporation insufficient to establish publicity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert L. Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1986-02-25· cited 131×
- Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 103×
- Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-14· cited 70×
- Woodbury v. Victory Van LinesD. Maryland· 2017-12-21· cited 53×
- Lemnah v. American Breeders Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-29· cited 38×
- Werner v. KliewerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-12-06· cited 37×
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsD. Kansas· 1996-05-24· cited 33×
- Medical Laboratory Management Consultants v. American Broadcasting CompaniesD. Arizona· 1998-12-22· cited 28×
- International Union v. GarnerM.D. Tennessee· 1985-01-28· cited 16×
- French v. American General Financial Services (In Re French)E.D. Tennessee· 2009-02-13· cited 16×
- Finley v. KellyM.D. Tennessee· 2019-06-14· cited 16×
- Satterfield v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc.D. South Carolina· 1985-09-06· cited 15×
- Benford v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.D. Maryland· 1986-05-14· cited 14×
- Bryant-Bruce v. Vanderbilt University, Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 1997-07-03· cited 13×
- Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.D. Kansas· 1997-11-25· cited 13×
- Flynn v. FlynnN.D. Ohio· 1983-04-21· cited 12×
- William D. Evans v. James H. DetlefsenSixth Circuit· 1988-09-15· cited 11×
- Citron v. CitronS.D. New York· 1982-06-01· cited 10×
- McQuade v. Michael Gassner Mechanical & Electrical Contractors, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1984-04-11· cited 9×
- Taylor v. Nationsbank N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-09· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 721×
- United States v. William Allan JonesSixth Circuit· 1976-09-30· cited 157×
- Beverly Camp Simpson v. John G. Simpson, IIIFifth Circuit· 1974-04-24· cited 126×
- Anonymous v. AnonymousSecond Circuit· 1977-07-20· cited 89×
- Kratz v. KratzE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-08-23· cited 75×
- Peggy Sue O'Neill and David O'neill, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Vartkes KiledjianSixth Circuit· 1975-02-24· cited 70×
- Langford Ex Rel. Langford v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court· 1956-02-03· cited 43×
- Birnbaum v. United StatesE.D. New York· 1977-08-17· cited 42×
- Martin v. Senators, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1967-07-03· cited 35×
- Rufus Lee Smith v. The Cincinnati Post & Times-StarSixth Circuit· 1973-03-21· cited 32×
- Bernard H. Tureen v. Equifax, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1978-02-21· cited 21×
- Cordell v. Detective Publications, Inc.E.D. Tennessee· 1968-05-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.