· 12/6/1985
Werner v. Kliewer
Citations
- 710 P.2d 1250
- 238 Kan. 289
- 1985 Kan. LEXIS 535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that communication to persons involved in a divorce proceeding did not constitute “publicity”
- noting that “the disclosure of intimate facts and opinions about [a person’s] mental condition would ordinarily be highly objectionable”
- for a publicity given to private life claim, the representation must be \highly offensive to a reasonable person\
- applying Second Restatement to invasion-of-privacy claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.