Skip to main content
· 8/2/2013

Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

Citations

  • 306 P.3d 1264
  • 2013 WL 3959858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when the discovery rule is applicable, the inquiry-notice date is usually when the limitations period begins to run
  • noting that claim generally accrues when the plaintiff “suffers the harm giving rise to it” but that when an element of the claim “is not immediately apparent” the common-law discovery rule may toll accrual of the claim
  • reaffirming the propriety of using evidentiary hearings when there is a material factual dispute about the accrual date of a cause of action
  • reaffirming the propriety of using evidentiary hearings when there is a material factual dispute about the accrual date of a cause of actlon
  • considering application of discovery rule to derivative shareholder suit brought under AS 09.10.053
  • applying statute of limitations for contract claims to legal malpractice claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Christen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.