· 8/2/2013
Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
Citations
- 306 P.3d 1264
- 2013 WL 3959858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that when the discovery rule is applicable, the inquiry-notice date is usually when the limitations period begins to run
- noting that claim generally accrues when the plaintiff “suffers the harm giving rise to it” but that when an element of the claim “is not immediately apparent” the common-law discovery rule may toll accrual of the claim
- reaffirming the propriety of using evidentiary hearings when there is a material factual dispute about the accrual date of a cause of action
- reaffirming the propriety of using evidentiary hearings when there is a material factual dispute about the accrual date of a cause of actlon
- considering application of discovery rule to derivative shareholder suit brought under AS 09.10.053
- applying statute of limitations for contract claims to legal malpractice claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Winfree, Stowers, Christen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.