Skip to main content
· 1/24/2002

Baty v. ProTech Insurance Agency

Citations

  • 63 S.W.3d 841
  • 2001 WL 1517401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that elements of claim are (1) an existing contract subject to interference; (2
  • noting entering into a settlement agreement when other claims were pending that were not referenced in the settlement agreement supported an inference that parties did not intend to include the other pending claims in the settlement agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kem Thompson Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.