ACS Investors, Inc. v. McLaughlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must show that the alleged act of interference with an existing contract was “willful and intentional”
• holding that corporate officer may not be personally liable for causing corporation to breach contract with another so long as officer acted in good faith
• explaining that “inducing a contract obligor to do what it has a right to do is not actionable interference”
• explaining that “inducing a contract obligor to do what it has a right to do is not actionable 13 interference”
• finding that the express terms of the contract in question showed that it was not subject to tortious interference allegations, and therefore the defendant could not have interfered as a matter of law.
• finding that the express terms of the contract in question showed that it was not subject to tortious interference allegations, and therefore the defendant could not have interfered as a matter of law.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).