Bath Industries, Inc. v. Blot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \All that is required is but one act within the forum district which represents more than an immaterial part of the allegedly illegal events.\
• “All that is required is but one act within the forum district which represents more than an immaterial part of the allegedly illegal events.”
• “[A]ll that is required is but one act within the forum district which represents more than an immaterial part of the alleged illegal events.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort Zimmerman
  D.C. Circuit· 1978-07-28· cited 249×
• Dan River, Inc. v. Icahn
  Fourth Circuit· 1983-01-07· cited 112×
• Dyer v. Eastern Trust and Banking Company
  D. Maine· 1971-12-30· cited 94×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,539 Liberty National Insurance Holding Company v. The Charter Company
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-06-01· cited 65×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,196 Corenco Corporation v. Schiavone & Sons, Inc., and Chester K. Twiss, Additional to Counterclaim
  Second Circuit· 1973-10-26· cited 54×
• Cousins v. Wigoda
  Seventh Circuit· 1972-06-29· cited 42×
• Wellman v. Dickinson
  S.D. New York· 1980-07-31· cited 34×
• Burkhart v. Allson Realty Trust
  N.D. Illinois· 1973-09-27· cited 32×
• Blanning v. Tisch
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-07-11· cited 26×
• Hilgeman v. National Insurance Co. of America
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-02-18· cited 25×
• Leff v. Cip Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 1982-03-18· cited 23×
• Gateway Industries, Inc. v. Agency Rent a Car, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1980-06-10· cited 23×
• Brucker v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Europe N.V.
  S.D. New York· 1976-11-15· cited 22×
• City of Philadelphia v. Sessions
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-11-15· cited 21×
• United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sierra Brokerage Services Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 2009-03-31· cited 20×
• Indiana National Corp. v. Rich
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-07-19· cited 20×
• Corenco Corporation v. Schiavone & Sons, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1973-08-09· cited 18×
• Cattlemen's Investment Company v. Fears
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1972-05-03· cited 18×
• Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 1980-03-03· cited 18×
• Ronson Corp. v. Liquifin Aktiengesellschaft
  Third Circuit· 1973-07-24· cited 18×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1,399×
• Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1960-09-26· cited 291×
• Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 231×
• Hosie v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
  Supreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 225×
• Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1969-01-24· cited 197×
• Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1963-04-22· cited 120×
• United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine Company
  Third Circuit· 1963-10-29· cited 81×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,610 the Susquehanna Corporation v. Pan American Sulphur Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-03-13· cited 67×
• Zorn v. Anderson
  S.D. New York· 1966-12-05· cited 57×
• Puma v. Marriott
  D. Delaware· 1969-01-03· cited 41×
• Lester L. Tatum, Individually and as Trustee v. H. W. Blackstock
  Fifth Circuit· 1963-06-25· cited 31×
• Beneficial Finance Co. of Wisconsin v. Wirtz
  Seventh Circuit· 1965-05-25· cited 17×
• Wharton v. Roth
  E.D. New York· 1964-12-22· cited 15×
• Dauphin Corporation v. Davis
  D. Delaware· 1962-01-23· cited 11×

Other cases named Bath Industries, Inc. v. Blot

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Bath Industries, Inc. v. Blot
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1969-11-03· cited 11×
• Bath Industries, Inc. v. Blot
  Seventh Circuit· 1970-07-17· cited 9×