Skip to main content
· 7/28/1978

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort Zimmerman

Citations

  • 587 F.2d 1149
  • 190 U.S. App. D.C. 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that some operative facts did occur in the District of Columbia where non-filing or misfilings with the SEC occurred
  • noting that district court’s ruling denying motion to transfer “was effectively a ruling that [appellant] had failed to shoulder his burden”
  • noting that the district court’s denial of a motion to transfer “was effectively a ruling that [the appellant] had failed to shoulder his burden”
  • noting that the district court's denial of a motion to transfer \was effectively a ruling that [the appellant] had failed to shoulder his burden\
  • noting that the district court's denial of a motion to transfer \was effectively a ruling that [the appellant] had failed to shoulder his burden\
  • noting that a filing occurs \in connection with the purchase or sale of any security\ under Section 10(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, Tamm, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.