Skip to main content
E.D. Missouri· 4/17/1986

Bastien v. R. Rowland & Co.

Citations

  • 631 F. Supp. 1554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that Supreme Court in Frow “held that entry of judgment against the party in default must await adjudication of liability on the merits with regard to the answering parties”
  • affirming without opinion district court order denying motion for default judgment because entry of default would have created an “inconsistent and unsupportable” result
  • summary judgment “accrue[d] to the benefit of” defaulting defendant “as well as to those parties who have actively defended against plaintiffs’ claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bastien v. R. Rowland & Co.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.