Wilcox v. Raintree Inns of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Frow should be applied to avoid inconsistent results where defendants are jointly and severally liable and where multiple defendants have closely related defenses
• extending Frow to cases where multiple defendants have closely related defenses
• “We do not … believe that the applicability of the Frow rule hinges on whether the defendants are jointly and severally liable. The Frow rule is also applicable in situations where multiple defendants have closely related defenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).