Jefferson v. Briner, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting a divide among federal courts regarding whether Frow is limited to cases involving joint and several liability
• relying on Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S. (15 Wall.) 552 (1872)
• relying on Frow v. De La Vega, U.S. (15 Wall.) 552 (1872)
• “logically inconsistent judgments resulting from an answering defendant’s success on the merits and another defendant’s suffering of a default judgment are to be 7 avoided.”
• “And, if Frow still _ stands for anything, it explicates a cautionary warning to the courts: logically inconsistent judgments resulting from an answering defendant's success on the merits and another defendant’s suffering of a default judgment are to be avoided.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).