Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/31/1990
Bass v. State
Citations
- 395 S.E.2d 171
- 302 S.C. 250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- $200 million in refunds \would impose a severe financial burden on the State and its citizens [and] endanger the financial integrity of the State\
- $200 million in refunds “would impose a severe financial burden on the State and its citizens [and] endanger the financial integrity of the State”
- Davis \established a new principle of law\
- Davis “established a new principle of law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-03-23· cited 91×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-03-01· cited 37×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-11-06· cited 33×
- Sheehy v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 1991-11-14· cited 9×
- Fonger v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-02-04· cited 9×
- Bass v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 7×
- Barker v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-07-12· cited 6×
- Yount v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1991-09-13· cited 4×
- Tisdale v. Williamsburg County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-07-06
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court· 1971-12-06· cited 2,532×
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,222×
- Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court· 1977-04-26· cited 698×
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 690×
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 606×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 358×
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 290×
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court· 1932-01-04· cited 248×
- Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court· 1920-04-26· cited 234×
- Hackman v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-05-25· cited 24×
- American Trucking Associations v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-03-14· cited 21×
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1989-07-14· cited 18×
- Wilson v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-04-02· cited 15×
- Mitchell v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-12-12· cited 9×
- City of Columbia v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-12-10· cited 4×
- Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-03-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.