Skip to main content

Wilson v. Jones

Citations

  • 314 S.E.2d 341
  • 281 S.C. 230
  • 1984 S.C. LEXIS 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Trimble should be given prospective effect only
  • holding that Trimble should be given prospective effect only
  • holding unconstitutional South Carolina's prior intestacy statute, S.C. Code Ann. Sec. 21-3-30 (1976), which prohibited inheritance by illegitimates from their putative father, following Trimble
  • refusal to apply Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762, 97 S. Ct. 1459, 52 L. Ed. (2d) 31 (1977), retroactively because it “would disrupt the orderly process of probate” in South Carolina
  • \where a person has the right to die intestate ... he is charged with full knowledge of who will succeed to his property if he dies intestate [and] the assumption exists that ... he is satisfied with the will the law of the state made for him\
  • finding S.C. Code Ann. § 21-3-30 (1976) unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Lewis, Littlejohn, Ness, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.