Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/17/2024

McCloskey v. McCloskey

Citations

2024 Ohio 1900

Syllabus

The domestic relations court erred in failing to clarify an ambiguous term in the divorce decree. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to hold a third-party defendant (the administrator of the husband's estate) in contempt of court. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Dutton v. Dutton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-03· cited 2×
In re J.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-16

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
Windham Bank v. Tomaszczyk
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-06-30· cited 287×
Liming v. Damos
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-10-24· cited 92×
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hunter
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-12-20· cited 64×
State ex rel. Soukup v. Celebrezze
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 48×
Jenkins v. Jenkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-14· cited 31×
Barton v. Barton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-17· cited 18×
Stocker v. Stocker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-10· cited 10×
Stevens v. Stevens
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-06· cited 6×
Denmark v. Denmark
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-16· cited 3×
Peterson v. McAfee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-01· cited 1×
McCloskey v. McCloskey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-24· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.