Janice S. Hope v. Mirek Klabal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a sophisticated party to a higher due diligence standard in a fraud claim
• concluding the voluntary dismissal of the remaining claims by stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1) left nothing “for the district court to resolve, and the suit had ended as far as that court was concerned”
• finding the doctrine inapplicable under Minnesota law in an action for fraud based on separate sales of multiple paintings spanning the course of many years
• “Ordinarily, a plaintiff’s reasonable diligence . . . will be questions of fact for a jury, but ‘[w]here the evidence leaves no room for a reasonable difference of opinion . . . the court may properly resolve facts issues as a matter of law.’”
• SOL for breach of fiduciary duty is six years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).