Skip to main content

Barron v. State

Citations

  • 662 S.E.2d 285
  • 291 Ga. App. 494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a skid steer is “special mobile equipment” and not a “motor vehicle”
  • holding that a skid steer is \special mobile equipment\ and not a \motor vehicle\
  • testimony of witnesses’ opinion that the value of stolen equipment exceeded $500 was sufficient because they had experience “in dealing with” that type of equipment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andrews, Ruffin, Bernes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.