Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 540 S.E.2d 305
  • 246 Ga. App. 347
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4155
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Knowledge that goods are stolen may ... be deduced by the jury from the defendant’s conduct and behaviorf.]”
  • “Knowledge that goods are stolen may . . . be deduced by the jury from the defendant’s conduct and behavior[.]”
  • “An owner does not have to be an expert to testify as to the value of his property (or that property under his control), provided he has experience or familiarity with such values.”
  • “An owner does not have to be an expert to testify as to the value of his property (or that property under his control), provided he has experience or familiarity with such values.”
  • “Contradictory statements by the defendant, coupled with the apparent nonexistence of the person from whom he contended he received the stolen property, authorize the jury to find that the defendant received the stolen property with knowledge that it had been stolen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, Eldridge, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.