Pippin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee’s testimony as to the value of stolen equipment was sufficient because employee had knowledge, experience, and familiarity with the value of the property in question
• employee’s testimony as to the value of stolen equipment was sufficient because employee had knowledge, experience, and familiarity with the value of the property in question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• The State v. Crowder
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-20· cited 6×
• Barron v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-05-13· cited 5×
• Lanier v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-08-26· cited 5×
• Partin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-02· cited 4×
• Mendez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-06-10· cited 3×
• Perdue v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-10-23· cited 2×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-25· cited 1×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-08-26
• Robert Mendez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-06-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sisk v. Carney
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1970-03-18· cited 46×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-09-11· cited 17×
• Maddox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-02-27· cited 14×
• MacK v. Ricketts
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-01-06· cited 13×