Supreme Court of Georgia· 5/16/2011
Barrett v. State
Citations
- 709 S.E.2d 816
- 289 Ga. 197
- 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1506
- 2011 Ga. LEXIS 380
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he trial court’s findings on disputed facts will be upheld unless clearly erroneous, and its application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.”
- “[T]he trial court’s findings on disputed facts will be upheld unless clearly erroneous, and its application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.”
- trial court’s factual finding that defendant did not suffer from cognitive impairment sufficient to show that he did not have the capacity to understand and knowingly waive Miranda rights was not clearly erroneous
- “A statement which is spontaneous and unsolicited as not made in response to any form of custodial interrogation is not bound by the strictures of Miranda and is admissible without the warnings having been given”
- “In this Court’s review of a trial court’s grant or denial of a motion to suppress, the trial court’s findings on disputed facts will he upheld unless clearly erroneous, and its application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.” (Citation omitted)
- “In this Court’s review of a trial court’s grant or denial of a motion to suppress, the trial court’s findings on disputed facts will be upheld unless clearly erroneous, and its application of the law to undisputed facts is subject to de novo review.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-03-16· cited 173×
- Shelton R. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-04-10· cited 30×
- Wilder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-11-07· cited 24×
- Registe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-05· cited 23×
- Flemister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-02· cited 19×
- MATHENIA v. BRUMBELOWSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-05-18· cited 19×
- Hickman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-06-20· cited 18×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-06-22· cited 12×
- Colton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-17· cited 10×
- The State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-11-02· cited 10×
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-06-17· cited 9×
- In the Interest of L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-02· cited 9×
- Farley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-09· cited 8×
- Hatcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-15· cited 8×
- Brandt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-24· cited 7×
- Morales v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-29· cited 7×
- The State v. Domenge-DelhoyoCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-15· cited 6×
- Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-20· cited 6×
- The STATE v. EDWARDS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-05-11· cited 3×
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-01-23· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-11-30· cited 81×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-02-09· cited 71×
- Velazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-01-08· cited 41×
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-04-25· cited 40×
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-09-19· cited 37×
- Canty v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-01· cited 22×
- Height v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-03-26· cited 14×
- Potter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-02· cited 10×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-10-05· cited 3×
- Billingsley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.