Barnes v. Delta Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the statutes in question were enacted to protect the class of persons to which the plaintiff belonged
• concluding that the statutes in question were enacted to protect the class of persons to which the plaintiff belonged
• holding that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A 40040 25 proximate cause is a question of fact for the jury
• holding that failure to give negligence per se instruction was prejudicial to plaintiffs case because instruction would have shifted “the burden of proof to [defendants] to show excuse or justification”
• concluding that the requirements of NRCP 51 were met when the appellants provided the trial judge with a citation to relevant legal authority in support of giving their proposed instruction, which placed the judge on notice regarding the issues of law involved
• concluding that the requirements of NRCP 51 were met when the appellants provided the trial judge with a citation to relevant legal authority in support of giving their proposed instruction, which placed the judge on notice regarding the issues of law involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).