Nevada Supreme Court· 9/27/1983

Barnes v. Delta Lines, Inc.

Citations

669 P.2d 709
99 Nev. 688
1983 Nev. LEXIS 519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the statutes in question were enacted to protect the class of persons to which the plaintiff belonged
concluding that the statutes in question were enacted to protect the class of persons to which the plaintiff belonged
holding that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A 40040 25 proximate cause is a question of fact for the jury
holding that failure to give negligence per se instruction was prejudicial to plaintiffs case because instruction would have shifted “the burden of proof to [defendants] to show excuse or justification”
concluding that the requirements of NRCP 51 were met when the appellants provided the trial judge with a citation to relevant legal authority in support of giving their proposed instruction, which placed the judge on notice regarding the issues of law involved
concluding that the requirements of NRCP 51 were met when the appellants provided the trial judge with a citation to relevant legal authority in support of giving their proposed instruction, which placed the judge on notice regarding the issues of law involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.