Tidwell v. Clarke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that when counsel timely calls the court's attention to the issues of law, a slight omission in compliance with NRCP 51 will not preclude appellate review
• providing that when counsel timely calls the court’s attention to the issues of law, a slight omission in compliance with NRCP 51 will not preclude appellate review
• stating that even though “[t]his court has held to a hard line in interpreting NRCP 51,” the requirements of NRCP 51 do not need to be strictly complied with where counsel calls the court’s attention to the issue of law involved in a clear and timely manner
• where counsel timely calls to court’s attention the issues of law involved, a slight omission in compliance with NRCP 51 will not preclude appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).