Johnson v. Egtedar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that NRCP 51's requirements were satisfied when appellant's objection, respondent's initial objection to the court, and a review of the record revealed that the district court was adequately apprised of the issue of law involved and had an opportunity to correct the error
• concluding that NRCP 51’s requirements were satisfied when appellant’s objection, respondent’s initial objection to the court, and a review of the record revealed that the district court was adequately apprised of the issue of law involved and had an opportunity to correct the error
• “A trial court has broad discretion to permit the jury to draw an adverse inference from the loss or destruction of evidence.”
• “The scope of a witness’ testimony and whether a witness will be permitted to testify as an expert witness are within the discretion of the trial court, and the trial court’s ruling will not be disturbed unless there is an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).