Barnes v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Changed circumstances sufficient to warrant modification do not have to be permanent in nature, but only that the change is a continuing one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cowart v. White
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 52×
• Barnes v. Barnes
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1992-11-23· cited 35×
• Marriage of Reeves v. Reeves
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-01-21· cited 20×
• Danner v. Danner
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-08-20· cited 20×
• Balvich v. Balvich (In Re Balvich)
  N.D. Indiana· 1991-05-22· cited 10×
• Balvich v. Balvich (In Re Balvich)
  N.D. Indiana· 1991-11-25· cited 8×
• Searcy v. Searcy
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 7×
• Nelson v. Scalzitti
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-12-04· cited 4×
• Barnes v. Barnes
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-02-19· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Geberin v. Geberin
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-02-21· cited 72×
• Whitman v. Whitman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-06-17· cited 70×
• Meehan v. Meehan
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-09-08· cited 62×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Larsen v. Larsen
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-15· cited 33×
• Rohn v. Thuma
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-12· cited 30×
• Payson v. Payson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-12-15· cited 29×
• Kruse v. Kruse
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-06-19· cited 29×
• Baker v. Baker
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-01-29· cited 28×
• Hayden v. Hite
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-07-07· cited 22×
• Marriage of Hawblitzel v. Hawblitzel
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-04-21· cited 22×
• Hiland v. Hiland
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-08-29· cited 9×