Skip to main content
· 9/15/1967

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Larsen v. Larsen

Citations

  • 211 Pa. Super. 30
  • 234 A.2d 18
  • 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an appellate court has the authority to amend a verdict to conform with the obvious intention of the trial court
  • “We are reluctant to formulate a rule which would, in all cases, prevent a child from attending the college of his choice simply because it is more expensive than the [Sjtatesupported university”
  • court must determine whether the college expenses are “reasonable under the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.