Skip to main content

Kruse v. Kruse

Citations

  • 464 N.E.2d 934
  • 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 2726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state court did not infringe upon jurisdiction of bankruptcy court or order debtor-husband to pay any prebankruptcy petition debts when it decided to modify child support due to substantial and continuing change of circumstances
  • husband’s discharge of second mortgage on house, which resulted in foreclosure, constituted a substantial change of circumstances for modification of child support
  • petition for modification of support is not an attempt to subvert the jurisdiction of bankruptcy court
  • petition for modification of support is not an attempt to subvert the jurisdiction of bankruptcy court
  • “To grant modification of support only from the date of the court’s order detracts from the purposes of the changed circumstances and serves to encourage and benefit dilatory tactics”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Staton, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kruse v. Kruse

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.