Indiana Supreme Court· 4/1/1985
Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
Citations
- 476 N.E.2d 84
- 1985 Ind. LEXIS 792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- extending the discovery rule rationale of Barnes to all tort claims
- liposarcoma caused by toxic chemical
- exposure to a Daikon Shield
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Hunter, Debru-Ler, Prentice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 381×
- Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesFederal Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 267×
- Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-02-14· cited 133×
- Orr v. Turco Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-25· cited 131×
- Madlem v. ArkoIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 125×
- Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 121×
- Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-01-22· cited 120×
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-04-14· cited 87×
- Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-10-15· cited 74×
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 68×
- Cleremont L. Covalt and Ahnighita M. Covalt v. Carey Canada Inc. And Union Carbide CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1988-11-07· cited 67×
- Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg and Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., and Peg GoldbergSeventh Circuit· 1990-11-21· cited 63×
- Fager v. HundtIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-12· cited 63×
- Havens v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 63×
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-04-28· cited 62×
- Doe v. United Methodist ChurchIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-13· cited 59×
- Burks v. RushmoreIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 52×
- Covalt v. Carey Canada, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-09-21· cited 50×
- AlliedSignal, Inc. v. OttIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 46×
- Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1991-12-26· cited 45×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 1,351×
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-02· cited 371×
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-04-09· cited 260×
- Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-26· cited 233×
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 164×
- City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-01-22· cited 133×
- Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1973-12-13· cited 79×
- Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-07-11· cited 74×
- Peters v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court· 1976-08-05· cited 68×
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-10-09· cited 67×
- Edwards v. FordSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-06-06· cited 50×
- Bunker v. National Gypsum Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-10-26· cited 47×
- Family Savings and Loan, Inc. v. CiccarelloWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1974-07-16· cited 46×
- Babson Bros. Co. v. Tipstar Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-03-07· cited 44×
- Sorenson v. PavlikowskiNevada Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 34×
- Jaramillo v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-09-05· cited 34×
- Monsanto Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-10-26· cited 34×
- Cameron v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-01-22· cited 30×
- Wojcik v. AlmaseIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-07-11· cited 23×
- McKee v. RiordanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-11-30· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.