Tenth Circuit· 12/26/1991

Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

Citations

952 F.2d 1215
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29965
1991 WL 273920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that issuance of revised operating handbook did not recommence running of Indiana's statute of repose
rejecting plaintiffs argument that operator manual/handbook was replacement part for purposes of statute of repose; holding the instruction page was not a separate product so as to recommence the running of the statute of repose
finding Indiana statute of repose was not unconstitutional under state or federal constitutions
\the essence of plaintiffs' claims regarding the Beechcraft A23A Musketeer fuel system is failure to warn of a dangerous condition which existed at the time of the original manufacture and delivery of the aircraft in 1967\
under some products liability statutes, repose period begins when purchaser receives product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Holloway, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.