Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing an 18]/amended complaint that “merely added certain claims and parties and deleted certain claims, as [p]iaintiffs were permitted to do under Rule 15(a)”
• finding transfer inappropriate where “either forum would offer some 20 conveniences and inconveniences to both the parties and witnesses”
• finding 12 transfer “not appropriate” where “effect would be simply to shift the inconvenience from 13 one party to another” (internal quotation and citation omitted)
• finding 6 transfer “not appropriate” where “effect would be simply to shift the inconvenience from 7 one party to another” (internal quotation and citation omitted)
• “[C]ourts in this District have commonly 14 articulated the relevant factors as follows . . . convenience of the parties . . . any local interest in 15 the controversy . . . .”
• “[C]ourts in this District have commonly 14 articulated the relevant factors as follows . . . convenience of the parties . . . any local interest in 15 the controversy . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2014-04-10· cited 68×
• Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.
  N.D. California· 2014-08-14· cited 29×
• Speedfit LLC v. Woodway USA, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2014-10-10· cited 23×
• No Cost Conference, Inc. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2013-04-16· cited 17×
• Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.
  N.D. California· 2012-02-02· cited 11×
• Mattero v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
  N.D. California· 2018-09-17· cited 8×
• Int'l Aero Prods., LLC v. Aero Advanced Paint Tech., Inc.
  C.D. California· 2018-08-28· cited 5×
• PerfectVision Manufacturing, Inc. v. PPC Broadband, Inc.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2013-06-10· cited 3×

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Van Dusen v. Barrack
  Supreme Court· 1964-03-30· cited 3,077×
• Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 3,025×
• Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,521×
• Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. Stack
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-21· cited 2,332×
• MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,786×
• Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
  Supreme Court· 1952-02-04· cited 972×
• KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. A
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 866×
• Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-05-03· cited 723×
• Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-03-27· cited 664×
• Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-12-01· cited 571×
• Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1978-06-27· cited 409×
• In Re Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 337×
• Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-10-31· cited 323×
• Pacesetter Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. And Med Rel Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-05-24· cited 292×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
  Third Circuit· 1988-08-26· cited 273×
• Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-25· cited 263×
• Galustian v. Peter
  Fourth Circuit· 2010-01-15· cited 243×
• CONNECTU LLC v. Zuckerberg
  First Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 200×

Other cases named Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.
  N.D. California· 2012-02-02· cited 11×