Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing an 18]/amended complaint that “merely added certain claims and parties and deleted certain claims, as [p]iaintiffs were permitted to do under Rule 15(a)”
• finding transfer inappropriate where “either forum would offer some 20 conveniences and inconveniences to both the parties and witnesses”
• finding 12 transfer “not appropriate” where “effect would be simply to shift the inconvenience from 13 one party to another” (internal quotation and citation omitted)
• finding 6 transfer “not appropriate” where “effect would be simply to shift the inconvenience from 7 one party to another” (internal quotation and citation omitted)
• “[C]ourts in this District have commonly 14 articulated the relevant factors as follows . . . convenience of the parties . . . any local interest in 15 the controversy . . . .”
• “[C]ourts in this District have commonly 14 articulated the relevant factors as follows . . . convenience of the parties . . . any local interest in 15 the controversy . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).