· 2/4/1952
Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
Citations
- 342 U.S. 180
- 72 S. Ct. 219
- 96 L. Ed. 2d 200
- 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2805
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
- noting that ”[n]ecessarily, an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
- recognizing the need to give due “regard to conservation of judicial resources and comprehensive disposition of litigation” in ruling on similar motions
- noting that an alleged infringer cannot use the Declaratory Judgment Act to give it “a paramount right to choose the forum for trying out questions of infringement and validity.”
- noting that, in questions of priority between similar proceedings, “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
- noting that, in questions of priority between similar proceedings, “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frankfurter, Black
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.