Skip to main content
· 2/4/1952

Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 342 U.S. 180
  • 72 S. Ct. 219
  • 96 L. Ed. 2d 200
  • 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
  • noting that ”[n]ecessarily, an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
  • recognizing the need to give due “regard to conservation of judicial resources and comprehensive disposition of litigation” in ruling on similar motions
  • noting that an alleged infringer cannot use the Declaratory Judgment Act to give it “a paramount right to choose the forum for trying out questions of infringement and validity.”
  • noting that, in questions of priority between similar proceedings, “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”
  • noting that, in questions of priority between similar proceedings, “an ample degree of discretion, appropriate for disciplined and experienced judges, must be left to the lower courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frankfurter, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.