Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 10/7/2016
MITCHELL v. STATE
Citations
- 2016 OK CR 21
- 387 P.3d 934
- 2016 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
- 2016 WL 5936884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Trial courts should use the uniform jury instructions if they state the applicable law.” (emphasis added)
- “Trial courts should use the uniform jury instructions if they state the applicable law.” (emphasis added)
- \The possibility that a defendant may later disrupt a trial is not a reason to deny self-representation before any disruption has occurred.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Vice-Presiding, Lumpkin, Johnson, Lewis, Hudson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- BOSSE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-05-25· cited 50×
- DAVIS v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-03-22· cited 37×
- United States v. CantuTenth Circuit· 2020-07-06· cited 31×
- BARNES v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2017-11-22· cited 20×
- GORDON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-10-03· cited 14×
- WHITE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2019-02-14· cited 13×
- SHAW v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2021-10-14· cited 2×
- ARCE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2023-05-11· cited 1×
- KELLY III v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2023-12-21· cited 1×
- BU v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2025-10-07· cited 1×
- MITCHELL v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2016-10-07
- BROWN v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-02-15
- LAMAR v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-03-22
- BRAMLETT v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-05-31
- TRYON v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2018-05-31
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-06-08· cited 378×
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-05-15· cited 263×
- NELOMS v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-03-28· cited 157×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-03-05· cited 112×
- Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-01-11· cited 103×
- Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-05-03· cited 91×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-04-21· cited 67×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1998-12-10· cited 63×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-11-22· cited 57×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-11-02· cited 56×
- Barnard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2012-10-30· cited 55×
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-12-14· cited 51×
- Levering v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2013-11-21· cited 50×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-11-22· cited 43×
- Goode v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-06-09· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.