Garson v. Perlman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the petitioner's claim that \the prosecutor's arguments in opening and closing exceeded the theory disclosed in the Bill of Particulars\ as not cognizable on federal habeas corpus review
• claimed violations of “state criminal procedural and substantive statutes” do not give rise to federal habeas claims
• claimed violations of “state criminal procedural and substantive statutes” do not give rise to federal habeas claims
• claimed violations of “state criminal procedural and substantive statutes” do not give rise to federal habeas claims
• claimed violations of “state criminal procedural and substantive statutes” do not give rise to federal habeas claims
• claimed violations of “state criminal procedural and substantive statutes” do not give rise to federal habeas claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).