Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 6/25/2004
Barbour v. State
Citations
- 903 So. 2d 858
- 2004 WL 1418383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that `Barbour's contention that the rule in Apprendi v. New Jersey [, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)]and by extension, the rule in Ring v. Arizona [, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)]apply retroactively to his death sentence is without merit'
- holding that ‘Barbour’s contention that the rule in Apprendi v. New Jersey [, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) ] — and by extension, the rule in Ring v. Arizona [, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) ] — apply retroactively to his death sentence is without merit’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baschab, Wise
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia CountyEleventh Circuit· 2010-01-06· cited 178×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-04-04· cited 43×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-08-25· cited 38×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-04-27· cited 33×
- Madison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-09-29· cited 17×
- Yeomans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-03-29· cited 14×
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-09-29· cited 10×
- Mark Allen Jenkins v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-08-26· cited 9×
- Fagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-02-23· cited 7×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-09-28· cited 4×
- Musgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-11-02· cited 4×
- Lloyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-10-04· cited 2×
- McRath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-10-04
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-01-28
- Benjamin Young v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-03-24
- Joseph Michael Wilson v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: CC-97-164.60)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-06-28
- State of Alabama v. Albert Mack III; Albert Mack III v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CC-93-1204.60)Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-12-20
- Joseph Michael Wilson v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-08-22
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 1,327×
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court· 2000-01-24· cited 840×
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court· 1976-06-10· cited 635×
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1949-12-05· cited 524×
- Turner v. CrosbyEleventh Circuit· 2003-07-29· cited 393×
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-08-03· cited 121×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-03-15· cited 96×
- McGahee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-05-30· cited 88×
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-05-26· cited 85×
- Barbour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-03-03· cited 64×
- Arrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-08-22· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.