Barber v. Smh (Us), Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts only imply contractual terms when there is “no express contract covering the same subject matter”
• noting that courts only imply contractual terms when there is “no express contract covering the same subject matter”
• finding no basis for a claim of unjust enrichment where there was an express agreement “regarding plaintiffs entitlement to commissions”
• listing receipt of benefit and inequity as essential elements of unjust enrichment claim
• “In analyzing oral statements for contractual implications, a court must determine the meaning that reasonable persons might have attached to the language.”
• “[A] contract will be implied only if there is no express contract covering the same subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).