Belle Isle Grill Corp. v. City of Detroit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an essential element of unjust enrichment under Michigan law is receipt of a benefit by the defendant from the plaintiff
• noting that unjust enrichment claims will not lie when a contract exists that covers the same subject matter
• stating that “a contract will be implied only if there is no express contract covering the same subject matter.”
• explaining that because Michigan does not recognize a claim for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, the trial court properly dismissed the claim
• “[A] contract will be implied only if there is no express contract covering the same subject matter.”
• “a contract will be implied only if there is no express contract covering the same subject matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).