Apj Associates, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that under Michigan law, “[p]romissory estoppel may not be used to override the express agreement of the parties contained in written agreements”
• “when there is an express contract governing the relationship out of which the promise emerged, and no issue of consideration, there is no gap in the remedial system for promissory estoppel to fill.”
• “[T]he Act itself states that the parties’ agreement will be held to define the scope of the obligation to pay commissions . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).