Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/8/2019

Barbara Marks v. Wanda Hudson

Citations

  • 933 F.3d 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim was properly dismissed when the complaint “at most” made only “unwarranted conclusions about a defendant's actual knowledge.”
  • “Because nonprecedential opinions do not establish any binding law for the circuit, they cannot be the source of clearly established law for qualified immunity analysis.” (citation omitted)
  • nonprecedential opinions cannot be a source of clearly established law
  • unpublished cases can’t clearly establish the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Owen, Southwick, Higginson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.