United States Ex Rel. Willard v. Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in not allowing the plaintiff to amend its complaint because the plaintiff had already had two opportunities to amend their complaint
• explaining that liability attaches to a false claim for payment not “a health care provider’s disregard of Government regulations or improper internal policies”
• stating that leave to amend may be denied if there is “repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed”
• stating that “the court may consider ... matters of which judicial notice may be taken”
• noting that conclusory statements and ogee factual deductions do not suffice to defeat a motion to dismiss
• holding leave to amend was properly denied where the relator had previously filed two amended complaints

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).