Skip to main content
· 6/14/2013

In the Interest of E.C.R., Child

Citations

  • 402 S.W.3d 239
  • 56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 666
  • 2013 WL 2660130
  • 2013 Tex. LEXIS 473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that findings under section 161.001(1)(O) that parent failed to complete services can support best interest finding
  • holding that findings under section 161.001(1)(O) can also 14 be probative in the best interests analysis
  • holding that a reviewing court may examine a parent’s history with other children as a factor of the risks or threats of another child’s environment
  • holding that lack of definite plans for child’s permanent placement did not bar conclusion that termination of parental rights was in child’s best interest
  • holding that the parental conduct described in subsection (O) was established as a matter of law
  • holding that findings under section 161.001(l)(O) that parent failed to complete court-ordered services can support best interest finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.