Banks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if a court has abused its discretion in excluding evidence, this Court affirms unless there was significant prejudice to deny the accused of his or her right to a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hoskins v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-09-22· cited 89×
• Joyner v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-04-18

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holmes v. South Carolina
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
• United States v. Leonard James and Otto Sebold
  Second Circuit· 1979-12-18· cited 106×
• Weber v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-01-17· cited 94×
• Lampkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-08-02· cited 65×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1991-11-07· cited 51×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2010-10-11· cited 51×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2006-04-27· cited 45×
• Allen v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-07-07· cited 20×
• Harper v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-14· cited 18×
• Gallaway v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2013-05-02· cited 11×